PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFGX vs. GRNB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFGX vs. GRNB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX) and VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFGX vs. GRNB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFGX
Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF
-0.35%3.46%3.75%4.95%
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
-0.87%7.09%3.31%5.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGX achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly higher than GRNB's -0.87% return.


DFGX

1D
0.61%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRNB

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-0.87%
6M
0.15%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFGX vs. GRNB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFGX and GRNB have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFGX vs. GRNB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGX
DFGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
DFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GRNB
GRNB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GRNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGX vs. GRNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX) and VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFGXGRNBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

1.11

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.00

1.59

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.64

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.61

6.81

-3.20

DFGX vs. GRNB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the GRNB Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGX and GRNB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFGXGRNBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.11

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.44

+0.65

Correlation

The correlation between DFGX and GRNB is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DFGX vs. GRNB - Dividend Comparison

DFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than GRNB's 4.29% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFGX
Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF
2.78%2.84%4.61%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRNB
VanEck Green Bond ETF
3.92%4.18%3.83%3.17%2.60%1.97%2.24%1.79%1.21%1.09%

Drawdowns

DFGX vs. GRNB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGX drawdown since its inception was -3.32%, smaller than the maximum GRNB drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGX and GRNB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFGXGRNBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-18.08%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.32%

-2.51%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-1.85%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-4.65%

+3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.60%

+0.25%

Volatility

DFGX vs. GRNB - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB) at 1.69%. This indicates that DFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRNB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFGXGRNBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

1.69%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

2.21%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

3.51%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.59%

4.92%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

4.91%

-0.32%