DFGR vs. IYRI
DFGR (Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF) and IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFGR is a REIT fund actively managed by Dimensional, while IYRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFGR returned 11.18% vs 9.17% for IYRI. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFGR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IYRI.
Performance
DFGR vs. IYRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFGR achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly higher than IYRI's 7.08% return.
DFGR
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 11.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYRI
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 7.36%
- 1Y
- 9.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFGR vs. IYRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF | 10.41% | 9.41% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 7.08% | 6.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFGR and IYRI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DFGR and IYRI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFGR vs. IYRI — Risk / Return Rank
DFGR
IYRI
DFGR vs. IYRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFGR | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 4.37 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFGR vs. IYRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFGR drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, which is greater than IYRI's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGR and IYRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFGR | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -12.12% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -7.53% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.52% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -1.69% | -4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.10% | +0.49% |
Volatility
DFGR vs. IYRI - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFGR | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 4.21% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.34% | 7.94% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 10.80% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 13.20% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 13.20% | +2.22% |
DFGR vs. IYRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFGR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IYRI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFGR vs. IYRI - Dividend Comparison
DFGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than IYRI's 11.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF | 3.85% | 4.05% | 3.73% | 2.77% | 0.59% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 11.96% | 11.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DFGR and IYRI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFGR has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to IYRI (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGR dropped -21.28% vs IYRI's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, DFGR leads with 11.18% vs 9.17% for IYRI. On fees, DFGR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFGR has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFGR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for IYRI.
IYRI has the higher dividend yield at 11.96%, compared with 3.85% for DFGR.
DFGR is categorized as REIT, while IYRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFGR and 0.68% for IYRI.
DFGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFGR and IYRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer