PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFGP vs. DFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFGP vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFGP vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFGP
Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF
-0.15%5.89%3.71%6.24%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
5.98%45.36%7.26%10.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGP achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 5.98% return.


DFGP

1D
0.64%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
0.35%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFIV

1D
2.74%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
5.98%
6M
15.53%
1Y
38.38%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFGP vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGP has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFGP vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGP
DFGP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DFGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGP Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGP Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGP vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFGPDFIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

2.25

-1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

2.94

-1.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

3.08

-1.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.50

13.72

-8.22

DFGP vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGP and DFIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFGPDFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.25

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

0.89

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between DFGP and DFIV is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DFGP vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

DFGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than DFIV's 2.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
DFGP
Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF
3.36%3.45%4.51%0.62%0.00%0.00%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.69%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%

Drawdowns

DFGP vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGP drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum DFIV drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGP and DFIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFGPDFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-25.42%

+22.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-12.12%

+8.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-5.95%

+3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-4.58%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

2.72%

-1.89%

Volatility

DFGP vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) is 2.15%, while Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that DFGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFGPDFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

6.81%

-4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

10.46%

-7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

17.16%

-12.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

16.71%

-12.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.63%

16.71%

-12.08%