DFGBX vs. HFADX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) and Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX).
DFGBX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 5, 1990. HFADX is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 30, 2003.
Performance
DFGBX vs. HFADX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFGBX vs. HFADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 0.25% | 3.13% | 5.37% | 5.00% | -6.63% | -1.03% | 1.52% | 4.04% | 1.68% | -0.88% |
HFADX Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D | -1.54% | 5.88% | 1.69% | 6.30% | -16.54% | -0.74% | 9.45% | 9.58% | 0.56% | 1.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFGBX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than HFADX's -1.54% return.
DFGBX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 2.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
HFADX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -1.54%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- -0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFGBX vs. HFADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFGBX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than HFADX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFGBX vs. HFADX — Risk / Return Rank
DFGBX
HFADX
DFGBX vs. HFADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) and Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFGBX | HFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 1.60 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 2.22 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.35 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.97 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 7.86 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFGBX | HFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.60 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | -0.15 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.31 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFGBX and HFADX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DFGBX vs. HFADX - Dividend Comparison
DFGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than HFADX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGBX DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 3.46% | 2.91% | 4.69% | 3.61% | 1.63% | 0.73% | 0.03% | 2.30% | 4.74% | 0.89% | 1.16% | 1.72% |
HFADX Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D | 3.50% | 3.75% | 2.94% | 2.40% | 8.93% | 1.47% | 4.47% | 3.62% | 5.05% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFGBX vs. HFADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFGBX drawdown since its inception was -9.63%, smaller than the maximum HFADX drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGBX and HFADX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFGBX | HFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -21.50% | +11.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.38% | -2.11% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.63% | -21.50% | +11.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -7.52% | +6.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.94% | -6.31% | +5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 0.53% | -0.10% |
Volatility
DFGBX vs. HFADX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Five Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGBX) is 0.76%, while Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that DFGBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFGBX | HFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 1.09% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.98% | 1.45% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64% | 2.54% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.16% | 5.92% | -3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.93% | 5.01% | -3.08% |