HFADX vs. EAIIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HFADX (Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D) and EAIIX (Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, HFADX returned -0.62%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for EAIIX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HFADX charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for EAIIX.

Performance

HFADX vs. EAIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFADX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than EAIIX's 3.75% return.

HFADX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 3.88%
• 5Y*: -0.62%
• 10Y*: —

EAIIX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 4.95%
• 1Y: 10.24%
• 3Y*: 6.65%
• 5Y*: 1.04%
• 10Y*: 2.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFADX vs. EAIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HFADX Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D	0.41%	5.88%	1.69%	6.30%	-16.54%	-0.74%	9.45%	9.58%	0.56%	1.89%
EAIIX Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund	3.75%	13.67%	-2.81%	8.45%	-11.29%	-5.71%	9.33%	6.09%	-2.67%	1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between HFADX and EAIIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017	0.45

The correlation between HFADX and EAIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HFADX vs. EAIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFADX

HFADX Risk / Return Rank: 53
HFADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
HFADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
HFADX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
HFADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
HFADX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

EAIIX

EAIIX Risk / Return Rank: 91
EAIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EAIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EAIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
EAIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EAIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFADX vs. EAIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HFADX	EAIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	3.15	-1.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	4.93	-1.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.66	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	4.47	-2.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.10	16.87	-7.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HFADX vs. EAIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the EAIIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFADX and EAIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HFADX	EAIIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	3.15	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	0.16	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.55	-0.20

Drawdowns

HFADX vs. EAIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFADX drawdown since its inception was -21.50%, smaller than the maximum EAIIX drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFADX and EAIIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFADX	EAIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.50%	-25.32%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.11%	-2.33%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.70%	-8.35%	+1.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.50%	-24.13%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.69%	-0.51%	-5.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.31%	-5.05%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.54%	0.62%	-0.08%

Volatility

HFADX vs. EAIIX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D (HFADX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) have volatilities of 0.86% and 0.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFADX	EAIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.86%	0.88%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.80%	2.43%	-0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24%	3.32%	-1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.93%	6.55%	-0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.98%	5.51%	-0.53%

HFADX vs. EAIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFADX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than EAIIX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFADX vs. EAIIX - Dividend Comparison

HFADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than EAIIX's 8.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAIIX Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund	8.75%	7.44%	4.80%	4.42%	4.54%	5.37%	6.13%	5.69%	4.70%	4.43%	5.53%	5.89%
HFADX Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class D	3.85%	3.75%	2.94%	2.40%	8.93%	1.47%	4.47%	3.62%	5.05%	1.55%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFADX and EAIIX in my portfolio?

HFADX and EAIIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFADX or EAIIX?

EAIIX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to HFADX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFADX dropped -21.50% vs EAIIX's -25.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.