DFFVX vs. TMDIX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) and AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX).
DFFVX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 23, 2000. TMDIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005.
Performance
DFFVX vs. TMDIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFFVX vs. TMDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio | 3.27% | 9.53% | 9.34% | 19.37% | -4.66% | 31.53% | 3.78% | 21.51% | -15.79% | 9.20% |
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund | -10.97% | -1.76% | 10.84% | 25.07% | -22.26% | 16.75% | 33.42% | 63.26% | -4.28% | 22.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFFVX achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly higher than TMDIX's -10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, DFFVX has underperformed TMDIX with an annualized return of 10.23%, while TMDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.64% annualized return.
DFFVX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- 3.27%
- 6M
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
TMDIX
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -9.23%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -23.70%
- 1Y
- -9.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFFVX vs. TMDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFFVX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TMDIX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFFVX vs. TMDIX — Risk / Return Rank
DFFVX
TMDIX
DFFVX vs. TMDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) and AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFFVX | TMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | -0.41 | +1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | -0.40 | +1.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.94 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | -0.52 | +1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | -1.36 | +6.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFFVX | TMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | -0.41 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.10 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFFVX and TMDIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFFVX vs. TMDIX - Dividend Comparison
DFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while TMDIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio | 1.66% | 1.69% | 1.40% | 2.26% | 5.17% | 2.74% | 1.52% | 3.82% | 5.95% | 5.16% | 3.95% | 5.84% |
TMDIX AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.08% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 29.72% | 18.28% | 31.06% | 16.38% | 14.44% | 5.90% | 7.73% |
Drawdowns
DFFVX vs. TMDIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFFVX drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than TMDIX's maximum drawdown of -48.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFFVX and TMDIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFFVX | TMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -48.73% | -15.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.71% | -25.45% | +10.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -30.53% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.75% | -35.44% | -15.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.07% | -25.45% | +17.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -7.07% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 9.77% | -5.81% |
Volatility
DFFVX vs. TMDIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio (DFFVX) is 4.90%, while AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that DFFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFFVX | TMDIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 5.87% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 16.89% | -4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.60% | 23.42% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 20.29% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 20.99% | +2.68% |