DFFVX vs. SCYVX
DFFVX (DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class) and SCYVX (AB Small Cap Value Portfolio) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DFFVX returned 11.05%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for SCYVX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFFVX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for SCYVX.
Performance
DFFVX vs. SCYVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFFVX achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly lower than SCYVX's 26.59% return. Over the past 10 years, DFFVX has outperformed SCYVX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while SCYVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.19% annualized return.
DFFVX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 26.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
SCYVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 19.97%
- YTD
- 26.59%
- 1Y
- 28.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
DFFVX vs. SCYVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class | 18.18% | 9.53% | 9.34% | 19.37% | -4.66% | 31.53% | 3.78% | 21.51% | -15.79% | 9.20% |
SCYVX AB Small Cap Value Portfolio | 26.59% | -0.02% | 11.46% | 7.82% | -16.68% | 35.56% | 3.45% | 25.72% | -16.43% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFFVX and SCYVX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DFFVX and SCYVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFFVX vs. SCYVX — Risk / Return Rank
DFFVX
SCYVX
DFFVX vs. SCYVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class (DFFVX) and AB Small Cap Value Portfolio (SCYVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFFVX | SCYVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.27 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | 9.68 | -0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFFVX vs. SCYVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFFVX drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than SCYVX's maximum drawdown of -47.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFFVX and SCYVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFFVX | SCYVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -47.74% | -16.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.70% | -8.71% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.09% | -27.12% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -29.12% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.75% | -47.74% | -3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -1.59% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -9.38% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.94% | +0.03% |
Volatility
DFFVX vs. SCYVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class (DFFVX) is 3.61%, while AB Small Cap Value Portfolio (SCYVX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that DFFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCYVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFFVX | SCYVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 4.32% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 11.43% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 17.12% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 21.64% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.55% | 23.89% | -0.34% |
DFFVX vs. SCYVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFFVX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SCYVX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFFVX vs. SCYVX - Dividend Comparison
DFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than SCYVX's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class | 1.51% | 1.69% | 1.40% | 2.26% | 5.17% | 2.74% | 1.52% | 3.82% | 5.95% | 5.16% | 3.95% | 5.84% |
SCYVX AB Small Cap Value Portfolio | 3.85% | 4.87% | 4.23% | 0.52% | 5.15% | 7.39% | 0.55% | 5.37% | 6.44% | 5.67% | 0.54% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DFFVX and SCYVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCYVX has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to DFFVX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFFVX dropped -64.21% vs SCYVX's -47.74%.
SCYVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFFVX and SCYVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer