PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFEVX vs. BMNSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFEVX vs. BMNSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets Value Portfolio (DFEVX) and Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEVX achieves a 25.72% return, which is significantly higher than BMNSX's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, DFEVX has outperformed BMNSX with an annualized return of 11.65%, while BMNSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


DFEVX

1D
0.93%
1M
9.39%
YTD
25.72%
6M
28.51%
1Y
49.44%
3Y*
23.60%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
11.65%

BMNSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.65%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.46%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFEVX vs. BMNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFEVX
DFA Emerging Markets Value Portfolio
25.72%29.50%6.17%16.50%-10.77%12.42%2.73%9.64%-11.92%33.77%
BMNSX
Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
1.26%4.63%2.26%5.28%-6.40%1.44%5.02%6.40%1.05%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEVX and BMNSX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2015

-0.01

The correlation between DFEVX and BMNSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFEVX vs. BMNSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFEVX
DFEVX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DFEVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BMNSX
BMNSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BMNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BMNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFEVX vs. BMNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets Value Portfolio (DFEVX) and Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFEVXBMNSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.96

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

2.82

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.88

9.89

+6.99

DFEVX vs. BMNSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is comparable to the BMNSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEVX and BMNSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFEVXBMNSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55

3.52

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.54

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.76

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.87

-0.35

Drawdowns

DFEVX vs. BMNSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEVX drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than BMNSX's maximum drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEVX and BMNSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFEVXBMNSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.59%

-10.24%

-57.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

-2.09%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.17%

-3.67%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-10.24%

-13.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.53%

-10.24%

-37.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.50%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.49%

-1.65%

-14.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

0.59%

+2.38%

Volatility

DFEVX vs. BMNSX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Emerging Markets Value Portfolio (DFEVX) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX) at 0.63%. This indicates that DFEVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFEVXBMNSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

0.63%

+5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

1.34%

+10.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

1.68%

+12.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

2.69%

+11.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

3.01%

+12.55%

DFEVX vs. BMNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEVX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNSX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFEVX vs. BMNSX - Dividend Comparison

DFEVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than BMNSX's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMNSX
Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
3.25%3.22%3.12%2.74%1.67%1.34%1.99%2.15%2.01%1.71%1.39%0.59%
DFEVX
DFA Emerging Markets Value Portfolio
2.98%3.80%4.68%4.39%4.44%3.82%2.47%2.47%2.49%2.45%1.99%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFEVX and BMNSX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFEVX has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to BMNSX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEVX dropped -67.59% vs BMNSX's -10.24%.

DFEVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 3.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFEVX and BMNSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer