DFEV vs. USO
DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEV is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. DFEV is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFEV returned 25.84%/yr vs 29.98%/yr for USO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFEV charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
DFEV vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEV achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.
DFEV
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 29.46%
- 6M
- 32.40%
- 1Y
- 57.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
DFEV vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 29.46% | 32.54% | 7.26% | 15.52% | -6.71% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 103.67% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | -8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEV and USO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.12 |
The correlation between DFEV and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEV vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
DFEV
USO
DFEV vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFEV | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.38 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 5.01 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.06 | 9.42 | +9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFEV | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32 | 2.31 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | -0.18 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
DFEV vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEV drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEV and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEV | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -98.19% | +79.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -20.39% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | -26.05% | +8.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -85.01% | +83.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -75.30% | +70.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 10.82% | -7.81% |
Volatility
DFEV vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) is 7.73%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that DFEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEV | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 14.87% | -7.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | 38.23% | -23.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 44.20% | -26.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 36.06% | -19.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 39.00% | -22.58% |
DFEV vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEV has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEV vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
DFEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.02% | 2.69% | 3.17% | 3.47% | 3.35% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEV and USO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to DFEV (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEV dropped -18.49% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 3-year performance, USO leads with 29.98% vs 25.84% for DFEV. On fees, DFEV is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, DFEV has been the lower-risk option at 7.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USO has performed better with a 29.98% return vs 25.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFEV is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
DFEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
DFEV is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DFEV and 0.86% for USO.
DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFEV and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer