DFEV vs. UEVM
DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) and UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEV is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional, while UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. DFEV is actively managed, while UEVM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFEV returned 25.84%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for UEVM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFEV charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for UEVM.
Performance
DFEV vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEV achieves a 29.46% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.
DFEV
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 29.46%
- 6M
- 32.40%
- 1Y
- 57.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UEVM
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
DFEV vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 29.46% | 32.54% | 7.26% | 15.52% | -6.71% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.99% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 17.41% | -7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEV and UEVM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DFEV and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFEV vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFEV
UEVM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
DFEV
UEVM
Financial Services
DFEV
UEVM
Consumer Cyclical
DFEV
UEVM
Industrials
DFEV
UEVM
Energy
DFEV
UEVM
Basic Materials
DFEV
UEVM
Communication Services
DFEV
UEVM
Consumer Defensive
DFEV
UEVM
Healthcare
DFEV
UEVM
Real Estate
DFEV
UEVM
Utilities
DFEV
UEVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEV vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank
DFEV
UEVM
DFEV vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFEV | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.30 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 2.56 | +2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.06 | 8.65 | +10.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFEV | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32 | 1.65 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.33 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
DFEV vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEV drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEV and UEVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEV | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -45.44% | +26.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -9.79% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | -18.88% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -2.18% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -11.67% | +7.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.89% | +0.12% |
Volatility
DFEV vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 5.15%. This indicates that DFEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEV | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 5.15% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | 12.13% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 15.18% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 15.90% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 18.39% | -1.97% |
DFEV vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEV has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEV vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison
DFEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than UEVM's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.02% | 2.69% | 3.17% | 3.47% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 3.05% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEV and UEVM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFEV has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEV dropped -18.49% vs UEVM's -45.44%.
On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 25.84% vs 18.34% for UEVM. On fees, DFEV is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 18.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFEV is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 2.02% for DFEV.
DFEV is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DFEV and 0.45% for UEVM.
DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFEV and UEVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer