DFEV vs. SPMO
DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEV is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. DFEV is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFEV returned 22.74%/yr vs 40.28%/yr for SPMO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFEV charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
DFEV vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEV achieves a 22.81% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 24.29% return.
DFEV
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 22.81%
- 6M
- 25.32%
- 1Y
- 46.17%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 22.86%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- 40.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.06%
- 10Y*
- 20.38%
DFEV vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 22.81% | 32.54% | 7.26% | 15.52% | -6.71% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 24.29% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | 1.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEV and SPMO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between DFEV and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFEV vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFEV
SPMO
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
DFEV
SPMO
Financial Services
DFEV
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
DFEV
SPMO
Industrials
DFEV
SPMO
Energy
DFEV
SPMO
Basic Materials
DFEV
SPMO
Communication Services
DFEV
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
DFEV
SPMO
Healthcare
DFEV
SPMO
Real Estate
DFEV
SPMO
Utilities
DFEV
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEV vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
DFEV
SPMO
DFEV vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFEV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 3.13 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.04 | 12.02 | +3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFEV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.13 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.98 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
DFEV vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEV drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEV and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -30.95% | +12.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -12.70% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | -20.13% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.42% | -4.65% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -4.60% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 3.30% | -0.22% |
Volatility
DFEV vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) have volatilities of 9.67% and 9.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEV | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.67% | 9.44% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.20% | 15.82% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.42% | 18.72% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 19.50% | -2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 20.41% | -3.73% |
DFEV vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEV has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEV vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
DFEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than SPMO's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.13% | 2.69% | 3.17% | 3.47% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEV and SPMO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFEV has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to SPMO (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEV dropped -18.49% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 40.28% vs 22.74% for DFEV. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 9.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 40.28% return vs 22.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DFEV.
DFEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.
DFEV is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DFEV and 0.13% for SPMO.
DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFEV and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer