PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFEV vs. DFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFEV vs. DFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEV achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly higher than DFUS's 10.53% return.


DFEV

1D
0.08%
1M
-3.76%
6M
9.07%
YTD
18.44%
1Y
35.77%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.19%

DFUS

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.02%
6M
8.87%
YTD
10.53%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.02M$11.82M$9.92M
$49.84M$58.02M$61.09M

DFEV vs. DFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
18.44%32.54%7.26%15.52%-6.08%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
10.53%17.46%24.34%26.36%-6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEV and DFUS is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.65

The correlation between DFEV and DFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFEV vs. DFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFEV
DFUS

Financial Services

27.8%
13.1%

Technology

23.8%
36.4%

Basic Materials

11.0%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
9.0%

Industrials

8.1%
9.2%

Energy

7.6%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.6%

Communication Services

2.3%
9.0%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.1%

Healthcare

1.9%
9.6%

Utilities

0.9%
2.7%

Financial Services

DFEV
27.8%
DFUS
13.1%

Technology

DFEV
23.8%
DFUS
36.4%

Basic Materials

DFEV
11.0%
DFUS
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DFEV
8.3%
DFUS
9.0%

Industrials

DFEV
8.1%
DFUS
9.2%

Energy

DFEV
7.6%
DFUS
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

DFEV
3.0%
DFUS
4.6%

Communication Services

DFEV
2.3%
DFUS
9.0%

Real Estate

DFEV
2.2%
DFUS
0.1%

Healthcare

DFEV
1.9%
DFUS
9.6%

Utilities

DFEV
0.9%
DFUS
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFEV vs. DFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFEV
DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFEV vs. DFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFEVDFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.26

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

9.66

-1.13

DFEV vs. DFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the DFUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEV and DFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFEV vs. DFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEV drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum DFUS drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEV and DFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFEVDFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-24.62%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.86%

-8.96%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

-19.44%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.62%

-1.30%

-9.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-5.69%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

2.09%

+2.05%

Volatility

DFEV vs. DFUS - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) at 3.70%. This indicates that DFEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFEVDFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

3.70%

+4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.68%

10.43%

+9.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.40%

13.28%

+8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

17.29%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

17.16%

+0.20%

DFEV vs. DFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEV has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUS's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFEV vs. DFUS - Dividend Comparison

DFEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than DFUS's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.17%2.69%3.17%3.47%3.35%0.00%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
0.86%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFEV and DFUS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFEV has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to DFUS (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEV dropped -18.49% vs DFUS's -24.62%.

On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 19.57% vs 19.24% for DFUS. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 19.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DFEV.

DFEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.86% for DFUS.

DFEV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DFUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DFEV and 0.09% for DFUS.

DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFEV and DFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer