PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFEU.L vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFEU.L vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Europe Defence UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (DFEU.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFEU.L is traded in GBP, while IS3N.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IS3N.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEU.L achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 26.55% return.


DFEU.L

1D
-1.29%
1M
-3.91%
YTD
1.23%
6M
7.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IS3N.DE

1D
-1.04%
1M
9.03%
YTD
26.55%
6M
28.28%
1Y
54.37%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFEU.L vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFEU.L and IS3N.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFEU.L vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFEU.L

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFEU.L vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Europe Defence UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (DFEU.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DFEU.L vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFEU.LIS3N.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.49

-0.93

Drawdowns

DFEU.L vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEU.L drawdown since its inception was -20.99%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEU.L and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFEU.LIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.99%

-31.33%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.78%

-1.04%

-14.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-8.75%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

Volatility

DFEU.L vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFEU.LIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.69%

16.67%

+16.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.69%

15.90%

+16.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.69%

17.99%

+14.70%

DFEU.L vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEU.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFEU.L vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFEU.L nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DFEU.L and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DFEU.L.

DFEU.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. DFEU.L tracks STOXX Europe Targeted Defence Index, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DFEU.L and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFEU.L and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer