DFEN vs. TSLR
DFEN (Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DFEN is passively managed, while TSLR is actively managed. Over the past year, DFEN returned 76.99% vs 19.41% for TSLR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFEN charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSLR.
Performance
DFEN vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEN achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly higher than TSLR's -27.58% return.
DFEN
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 76.99%
- 3Y*
- 64.38%
- 5Y*
- 29.22%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -19.09%
- YTD
- -27.58%
- 6M
- -31.37%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFEN vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 13.12% | 156.62% | 27.07% | 27.93% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -27.58% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEN and TSLR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | 0.32 |
DFEN vs. TSLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFEN
TSLR
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
DFEN
TSLR
-
Technology
DFEN
TSLR
-
Basic Materials
DFEN
-
TSLR
-
Communication Services
DFEN
-
TSLR
-
Consumer Cyclical
DFEN
-
TSLR
Consumer Defensive
DFEN
-
TSLR
-
Energy
DFEN
-
TSLR
-
Financial Services
DFEN
-
TSLR
-
Healthcare
DFEN
-
TSLR
-
Real Estate
DFEN
-
TSLR
-
Utilities
DFEN
-
TSLR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEN vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank
DFEN
TSLR
DFEN vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFEN | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.11 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 0.36 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 0.73 | +3.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFEN vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEN drawdown since its inception was -91.36%, which is greater than TSLR's maximum drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN and TSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEN | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.36% | -82.80% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.75% | -54.37% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.87% | -62.94% | +37.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.20% | -50.31% | +5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.99% | 26.72% | -8.73% |
Volatility
DFEN vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) is 27.31%, while GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a volatility of 28.92%. This indicates that DFEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEN | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.31% | 28.92% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.81% | 57.66% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.81% | 89.10% | -23.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.74% | 115.61% | -54.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.66% | 115.61% | -43.95% |
DFEN vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEN has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLR's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEN vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison
DFEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 7.89% | 8.89% | 14.12% | 1.13% | 0.46% | 1.89% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 1.07% | 1.50% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEN and TSLR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLR has higher volatility (28.92%) compared to DFEN (27.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEN dropped -91.36% vs TSLR's -82.80%.
On 1-year performance, DFEN leads with 76.99% vs 19.41% for TSLR. On fees, DFEN is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, DFEN has been the lower-risk option at 27.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFEN has performed better with a 76.99% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFEN is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.
DFEN has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DFEN and 1.50% for TSLR.
DFEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFEN and TSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer