DFEN vs. CIFG
DFEN (Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DFEN is passively managed, while CIFG is actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFEN charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
DFEN vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEN achieves a 15.64% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 96.56% return.
DFEN
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 11.93%
- YTD
- 15.64%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 71.10%
- 3Y*
- 68.88%
- 5Y*
- 30.03%
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 42.24%
- YTD
- 96.56%
- 6M
- 67.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFEN vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 15.64% | 13.89% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 96.56% | -32.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEN and CIFG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEN vs. CIFG — Risk / Return Rank
DFEN
CIFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFEN vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFEN | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFEN vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEN drawdown since its inception was -91.36%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEN | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.36% | -71.71% | -19.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.22% | -10.44% | -13.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.13% | -35.54% | -9.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.29% | — | — |
Volatility
DFEN vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEN | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.30% | 205.93% | -139.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.78% | 205.93% | -145.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.63% | 205.93% | -134.30% |
DFEN vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEN has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEN vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
DFEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, while CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 7.72% | 8.89% | 14.12% | 1.13% | 0.46% | 1.89% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 1.07% | 1.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEN and CIFG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for DFEN.
DFEN has the higher dividend yield at 7.72%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for DFEN and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for DFEN and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer