DFEN.DE vs. VDPG.L
DFEN.DE (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A) and VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEN.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFEN.DE returned 37.43%/yr vs 23.73%/yr for VDPG.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFEN.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VDPG.L.
Performance
DFEN.DE vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DFEN.DE is traded in EUR, while VDPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VDPG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEN.DE achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than VDPG.L's 49.24% return.
DFEN.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- 11.89%
- 3Y*
- 37.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDPG.L
- 1D
- 4.09%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 49.24%
- 6M
- 55.50%
- 1Y
- 78.51%
- 3Y*
- 23.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- —
DFEN.DE vs. VDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN.DE VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A | 3.04% | 50.76% | 51.97% | 22.65% |
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 49.24% | 23.76% | 1.62% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEN.DE and VDPG.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEN.DE vs. VDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
DFEN.DE
VDPG.L
DFEN.DE vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFEN.DE | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.61 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 5.79 | -5.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.72 | 20.94 | -19.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFEN.DE vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, smaller than the maximum VDPG.L drawdown of -43.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN.DE and VDPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEN.DE | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.88% | -43.68% | +24.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.88% | -13.18% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.88% | -24.49% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.01% | -4.73% | -11.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -10.44% | +7.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.15% | 3.65% | +4.50% |
Volatility
DFEN.DE vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) is 7.34%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that DFEN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEN.DE | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 10.92% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 19.97% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.01% | 22.38% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 21.84% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 24.04% | -2.82% |
DFEN.DE vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VDPG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEN.DE vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFEN.DE nor VDPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEN.DE and VDPG.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFEN.DE.
DFEN.DE is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while VDPG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. DFEN.DE tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFEN.DE and 0.15% for VDPG.L.
Find the right allocation for DFEN.DE and VDPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer