DFEM vs. XAR
DFEM (Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional, while XAR is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry. DFEM is actively managed, while XAR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFEM returned 23.24%/yr vs 34.11%/yr for XAR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFEM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
DFEM vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEM achieves a 25.59% return, which is significantly higher than XAR's 13.40% return.
DFEM
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 25.59%
- 6M
- 27.96%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 23.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.01%
DFEM vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEM Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | 25.59% | 29.51% | 7.53% | 13.91% | -8.69% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 13.40% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -3.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEM and XAR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.49 |
DFEM vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFEM
XAR
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DFEM
XAR
Financial Services
DFEM
XAR
-
Industrials
DFEM
XAR
Consumer Cyclical
DFEM
XAR
-
Basic Materials
DFEM
XAR
-
Communication Services
DFEM
XAR
-
Energy
DFEM
XAR
-
Healthcare
DFEM
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
DFEM
XAR
-
Utilities
DFEM
XAR
-
Real Estate
DFEM
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEM vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
DFEM
XAR
DFEM vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFEM | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.26 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 2.41 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 6.85 | +9.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFEM | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 1.55 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.85 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
DFEM vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEM drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum XAR drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEM and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEM | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.82% | -46.37% | +25.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -17.22% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.09% | -19.73% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -6.55% | +5.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -6.79% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 6.05% | -2.96% |
Volatility
DFEM vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) is 7.78%, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a volatility of 9.52%. This indicates that DFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEM | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 9.52% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 22.39% | -6.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.45% | 26.81% | -8.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 23.41% | -6.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 24.62% | -7.36% |
DFEM vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEM vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
DFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than XAR's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEM Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | 1.82% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.38% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEM and XAR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to DFEM (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEM dropped -20.82% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 3-year performance, XAR leads with 34.11% vs 23.24% for DFEM. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DFEM has been the lower-risk option at 7.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XAR has performed better with a 34.11% return vs 23.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DFEM.
DFEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.32% for XAR.
DFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while XAR is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DFEM and 0.35% for XAR.
DFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFEM and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer