PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFDPX vs. CTCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFDPX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Dent Premier Growth Fund (DFDPX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFDPX achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 32.06% return. Over the past 10 years, DFDPX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 12.24%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.


DFDPX

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.01%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-2.23%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*
12.24%

CTCAX

1D
1.47%
1M
17.00%
YTD
32.06%
6M
31.15%
1Y
61.81%
3Y*
36.07%
5Y*
20.96%
10Y*
24.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFDPX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFDPX
DF Dent Premier Growth Fund
-1.06%6.88%14.77%24.60%-28.05%17.01%28.33%42.94%1.71%31.97%
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
32.06%24.78%31.39%56.46%-34.81%22.73%49.46%43.91%-1.48%42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between DFDPX and CTCAX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2002

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between DFDPX and CTCAX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFDPX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFDPX
DFDPX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DFDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DFDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CTCAX
CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFDPX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Dent Premier Growth Fund (DFDPX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFDPXCTCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.49

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

4.43

-4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.59

16.56

-15.97

DFDPX vs. CTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFDPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the CTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFDPX and CTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFDPXCTCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

3.04

-2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.81

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

1.00

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.78

-0.33

Drawdowns

DFDPX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFDPX drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFDPX and CTCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFDPXCTCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-61.04%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.08%

-14.43%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

-26.67%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.38%

-39.55%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

-39.55%

+4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.83%

0.00%

-4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-10.68%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

3.86%

+2.55%

Volatility

DFDPX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DF Dent Premier Growth Fund (DFDPX) is 3.33%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that DFDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFDPXCTCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

6.37%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

16.72%

-5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

21.06%

-7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

25.98%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.13%

24.84%

-3.71%

DFDPX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFDPX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFDPX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison

DFDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than CTCAX's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
2.49%3.29%1.08%2.36%3.53%4.15%0.91%2.55%5.82%3.52%0.36%1.80%
DFDPX
DF Dent Premier Growth Fund
7.44%7.36%14.66%18.69%0.00%7.37%2.26%7.21%9.12%9.82%4.48%13.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFDPX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTCAX has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to DFDPX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFDPX dropped -58.16% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.

CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFDPX and CTCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer