DFDMX vs. FMDGX
DFDMX (DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DFDMX returned -1.64%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for FMDGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFDMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.
Performance
DFDMX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFDMX achieves a -5.49% return, which is significantly lower than FMDGX's 4.36% return.
DFDMX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- 6M
- -8.73%
- YTD
- -5.49%
- 1Y
- -8.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.83%
- 5Y*
- -1.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
FMDGX
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- —
DFDMX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFDMX DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund | -5.49% | 0.49% | 11.15% | 22.91% | -30.52% | 12.26% | 30.43% | 5.40% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 4.36% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFDMX and FMDGX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DFDMX and FMDGX has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFDMX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
DFDMX
FMDGX
DFDMX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFDMX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.04 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 0.21 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 0.60 | -1.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFDMX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFDMX drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, roughly equal to the maximum FMDGX drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFDMX and FMDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFDMX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.46% | -38.59% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.32% | -14.75% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.32% | -25.30% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.46% | -38.59% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.97% | -2.69% | -11.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.12% | -11.07% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.67% | 5.11% | +6.56% |
Volatility
DFDMX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) is 5.21%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that DFDMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFDMX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 6.14% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 13.69% | -0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.34% | 17.31% | -0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 22.51% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 24.27% | -3.88% |
DFDMX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFDMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFDMX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
DFDMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFDMX DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.79% | 0.30% | 0.87% | 3.52% | 0.30% | 0.09% | 3.21% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.78% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFDMX and FMDGX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMDGX has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to DFDMX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFDMX dropped -40.46% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.
FMDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFDMX and FMDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer