PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFDMX vs. DFDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFDMX vs. DFDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) and DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFDMX achieves a -9.39% return, which is significantly lower than DFDSX's -0.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFDMX having a 8.88% annualized return and DFDSX not far ahead at 9.05%.


DFDMX

1D
-0.86%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-9.39%
6M
-10.62%
1Y
-8.97%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
-1.11%
10Y*
8.88%

DFDSX

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.50%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-1.91%
1Y
0.60%
3Y*
6.27%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
9.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFDMX vs. DFDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFDMX
DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund
-9.39%0.49%11.15%22.91%-30.52%12.26%30.43%40.14%-0.24%31.22%
DFDSX
DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund
-0.71%-3.25%10.91%22.27%-30.31%14.54%34.68%36.34%-1.61%15.58%

Correlation

The correlation between DFDMX and DFDSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013

0.92

The correlation between DFDMX and DFDSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFDMX vs. DFDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFDMX
DFDMX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DFDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DFDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

DFDSX
DFDSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DFDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DFDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFDMX vs. DFDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) and DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFDMXDFDSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.04

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

0.14

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

0.35

-1.11

DFDMX vs. DFDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFDMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the DFDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFDMX and DFDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFDMXDFDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

0.13

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.01

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.42

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.40

+0.10

Drawdowns

DFDMX vs. DFDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFDMX drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, which is greater than DFDSX's maximum drawdown of -37.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFDMX and DFDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFDMXDFDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.46%

-37.88%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.32%

-17.07%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.32%

-24.53%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.46%

-37.88%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.46%

-37.88%

-2.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.52%

-13.65%

-3.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-10.02%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

6.89%

+3.59%

Volatility

DFDMX vs. DFDSX - Volatility Comparison

DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund (DFDMX) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX) at 4.20%. This indicates that DFDMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFDMXDFDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

4.20%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

12.70%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

17.79%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

22.12%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.45%

21.69%

-1.24%

DFDMX vs. DFDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFDMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than DFDSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFDMX vs. DFDSX - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFDMX nor DFDSX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFDMX
DF Dent Midcap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.79%0.30%0.87%3.52%0.30%0.09%3.21%
DFDSX
DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.29%2.06%1.46%7.54%0.00%0.00%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFDMX and DFDSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFDMX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to DFDSX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFDMX dropped -40.46% vs DFDSX's -37.88%.

DFDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFDMX and DFDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer