PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFDSX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFDSX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFDSX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, DFDSX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 9.05%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.


DFDSX

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.50%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-1.91%
1Y
0.60%
3Y*
6.27%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
9.05%

SCHG

1D
-1.23%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6.42%
6M
5.81%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.02%
5Y*
15.59%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFDSX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFDSX
DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund
-0.71%-3.25%10.91%22.27%-30.31%14.54%34.68%36.34%-1.61%15.58%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.42%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DFDSX and SCHG is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between DFDSX and SCHG has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFDSX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFDSX
DFDSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DFDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DFDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFDSX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFDSXSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.13

1.60

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.33

2.18

-1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.28

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

1.51

-1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.35

5.04

-4.70

DFDSX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFDSX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFDSXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

1.60

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.70

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.87

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.84

-0.45

Drawdowns

DFDSX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFDSX drawdown since its inception was -37.88%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFDSX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFDSXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.88%

-34.59%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.07%

-16.41%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.53%

-23.39%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.88%

-34.59%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.88%

-34.59%

-3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.65%

-1.78%

-11.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.02%

-5.20%

-4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

4.90%

+1.99%

Volatility

DFDSX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that DFDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFDSXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.61%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

11.62%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

15.50%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.12%

22.27%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

21.55%

+0.14%

DFDSX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFDSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFDSX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

DFDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFDSX
DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.29%2.06%1.46%7.54%0.00%0.00%0.99%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFDSX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFDSX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFDSX dropped -37.88% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFDSX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer