DFDSX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
DFDSX is managed by DF Dent Funds. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
DFDSX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFDSX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFDSX DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund | -8.32% | -3.25% | 10.91% | 22.27% | -30.31% | 14.54% | 34.68% | 36.34% | -1.61% | 15.58% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFDSX achieves a -8.32% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, DFDSX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.89%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
DFDSX
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -7.31%
- YTD
- -8.32%
- 6M
- -8.05%
- 1Y
- -4.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.45%
- 5Y*
- -1.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFDSX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFDSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFDSX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
DFDSX
SCHG
DFDSX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFDSX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | 0.76 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | 1.24 | -1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.17 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 1.09 | -1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.72 | 3.71 | -4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFDSX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 0.76 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.57 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.79 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.79 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFDSX and SCHG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFDSX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
DFDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFDSX DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.29% | 2.06% | 1.46% | 7.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.99% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
DFDSX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFDSX drawdown since its inception was -37.88%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFDSX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFDSX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.88% | -34.59% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.07% | -16.41% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.88% | -34.59% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.88% | -34.59% | -3.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.27% | -12.51% | -7.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.93% | -5.22% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.92% | 4.84% | +1.08% |
Volatility
DFDSX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX) is 6.28%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that DFDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFDSX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 6.77% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.88% | 12.54% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.04% | 22.45% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 22.31% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 21.51% | +0.19% |