PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFDSX vs. CTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFDSX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFDSX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 35.59% return.


DFDSX

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.50%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-1.91%
1Y
0.60%
3Y*
6.27%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
9.05%

CTSIX

1D
2.87%
1M
11.15%
YTD
35.59%
6M
35.33%
1Y
68.24%
3Y*
35.13%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFDSX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DFDSX
DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund
-0.71%-3.25%10.91%22.27%-30.31%14.54%34.68%7.00%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
35.59%25.90%44.34%7.57%-37.30%9.12%63.38%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DFDSX and CTSIX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between DFDSX and CTSIX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFDSX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFDSX
DFDSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DFDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DFDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CTSIX
CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFDSX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFDSXCTSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.13

2.52

-2.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.33

3.18

-2.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.40

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

5.65

-5.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.35

23.22

-22.87

DFDSX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFDSX and CTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFDSXCTSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

2.52

-2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.40

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.57

-0.18

Drawdowns

DFDSX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFDSX drawdown since its inception was -37.88%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFDSX and CTSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFDSXCTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.88%

-50.83%

+12.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.07%

-12.38%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.53%

-28.40%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.88%

-50.60%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.65%

0.00%

-13.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.02%

-20.64%

+10.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

3.00%

+3.89%

Volatility

DFDSX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund (DFDSX) is 4.20%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that DFDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFDSXCTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

9.40%

-5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

21.29%

-8.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

27.70%

-9.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.12%

28.00%

-5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

29.78%

-8.09%

DFDSX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFDSX and CTSIX have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Dividends

DFDSX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFDSX nor CTSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.77%4.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFDSX
DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.29%2.06%1.46%7.54%0.00%0.00%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFDSX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTSIX has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to DFDSX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFDSX dropped -37.88% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.

CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFDSX and CTSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer