PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFCSX vs. DFSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFCSX vs. DFSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio (DFCSX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFCSX achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly lower than DFSVX's 24.28% return. Over the past 10 years, DFCSX has underperformed DFSVX with an annualized return of 9.89%, while DFSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.


DFCSX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.66%
6M
2.90%
YTD
8.09%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
9.89%
ALL TIME*
9.46%

DFSVX

1D
1.26%
1M
4.86%
6M
11.62%
YTD
24.28%
1Y
37.36%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
11.78%
ALL TIME*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFCSX vs. DFSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFCSX
DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio
8.09%37.58%0.20%16.93%-20.12%14.66%15.07%25.90%-19.67%34.77%
DFSVX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I
24.28%8.37%9.58%19.02%-3.57%39.97%2.24%18.15%-15.13%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DFCSX and DFSVX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 1993

0.50

The correlation between DFCSX and DFSVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFCSX vs. DFSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFCSX
DFCSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DFCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSVX
DFSVX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DFSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFCSX vs. DFSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio (DFCSX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFCSXDFSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.41

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

4.04

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

13.51

-9.31

DFCSX vs. DFSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the DFSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFCSX and DFSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFCSX vs. DFSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFCSX drawdown since its inception was -65.47%, roughly equal to the maximum DFSVX drawdown of -66.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCSX and DFSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFCSXDFSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.47%

-66.70%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

-9.59%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.95%

-27.69%

+13.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.25%

-27.69%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-52.12%

+8.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.58%

-9.43%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

2.86%

+0.69%

Volatility

DFCSX vs. DFSVX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio (DFCSX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX) have volatilities of 3.77% and 3.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFCSXDFSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

3.62%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

10.69%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

16.73%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.97%

21.18%

-3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

23.79%

-6.21%

DFCSX vs. DFSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCSX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSVX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFCSX vs. DFSVX - Dividend Comparison

DFCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than DFSVX's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFCSX
DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio
2.81%3.02%4.94%2.84%2.45%1.19%1.55%2.24%6.28%1.98%1.97%1.97%
DFSVX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I
1.47%1.69%1.47%3.67%6.77%10.40%1.96%2.83%7.54%5.18%4.18%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFCSX and DFSVX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFCSX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to DFSVX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFCSX dropped -65.47% vs DFSVX's -66.70%.

DFSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFCSX and DFSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer