DFCSX vs. UEPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio (DFCSX) and ProFunds Europe 30 Fund (UEPIX).
DFCSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Apr 14, 1988. UEPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Mar 14, 1999.
Performance
DFCSX vs. UEPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFCSX vs. UEPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCSX DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio | -4.71% | 37.58% | 0.20% | 16.93% | -20.12% | 14.66% | 15.07% | 25.90% | -19.67% | 34.77% |
UEPIX ProFunds Europe 30 Fund | 5.46% | 28.46% | 2.60% | 18.54% | -7.83% | 24.46% | -9.97% | 17.87% | -12.48% | 19.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFCSX achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than UEPIX's 5.46% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: DFCSX at 8.75% and UEPIX at 8.75%.
DFCSX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -10.72%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 19.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
UEPIX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 5.46%
- 6M
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 15.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFCSX vs. UEPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFCSX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than UEPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFCSX vs. UEPIX — Risk / Return Rank
DFCSX
UEPIX
DFCSX vs. UEPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio (DFCSX) and ProFunds Europe 30 Fund (UEPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFCSX | UEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.60 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 2.19 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 2.02 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 10.26 | -5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFCSX | UEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.60 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.68 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.07 | +0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFCSX and UEPIX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFCSX vs. UEPIX - Dividend Comparison
DFCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than UEPIX's 1.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCSX DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio | 3.17% | 3.02% | 4.94% | 2.84% | 2.45% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 2.24% | 6.28% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
UEPIX ProFunds Europe 30 Fund | 1.57% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 0.87% | 2.64% | 0.82% | 12.56% | 0.96% | 3.21% | 11.73% |
Drawdowns
DFCSX vs. UEPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFCSX drawdown since its inception was -65.47%, smaller than the maximum UEPIX drawdown of -76.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCSX and UEPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFCSX | UEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.47% | -76.06% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.82% | -12.76% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.25% | -26.62% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.16% | -40.51% | -2.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.39% | -5.54% | -5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.68% | -43.47% | +29.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 2.54% | +0.88% |
Volatility
DFCSX vs. UEPIX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Continental Small Company Portfolio (DFCSX) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to ProFunds Europe 30 Fund (UEPIX) at 5.58%. This indicates that DFCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFCSX | UEPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 5.58% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 10.26% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 16.98% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 16.88% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 18.73% | -0.93% |