DFCF vs. IUSB
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB).
DFCF and IUSB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFCF is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 15, 2021. IUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Universal Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DFCF or IUSB.
Key characteristics
| DFCF | IUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.07% | 2.21% |
| 1Y Return | 8.59% | 8.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.52 | 1.54 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.32 | 2.30 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.57 | 0.60 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.90 | 5.87 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.41% | 1.46% |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.46% | 5.57% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.56% | -17.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.14% | -6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFCF and IUSB is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DFCF vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DFCF achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than IUSB's 2.21% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFCF vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFCF has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DFCF vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DFCF vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison
DFCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than IUSB's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCF Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF | 4.64% | 4.52% | 3.28% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSB iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.93% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.45% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% | 1.39% |
Drawdowns
DFCF vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFCF drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, which is greater than IUSB's maximum drawdown of -17.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCF and IUSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DFCF vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB) at 1.66%. This indicates that DFCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.