PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFCF vs. DFAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFCF vs. DFAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFCF vs. DFAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
-0.10%7.89%1.86%6.94%-14.48%0.23%
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
-1.60%15.66%19.61%21.96%-14.93%0.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFCF achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than DFAC's -1.60% return.


DFCF

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
0.91%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
10Y*

DFAC

1D
2.78%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
1.24%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFCF vs. DFAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFCF has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFCF vs. DFAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFCF
DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAC
DFAC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFCF vs. DFAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFCFDFACDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.03

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.56

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.54

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.55

7.28

-1.72

DFCF vs. DFAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the DFAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFCF and DFAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFCFDFACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.03

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.55

-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between DFCF and DFAC is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DFCF vs. DFAC - Dividend Comparison

DFCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than DFAC's 1.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
4.50%4.48%4.61%4.51%3.27%0.16%
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
1.03%0.97%1.03%1.20%1.50%0.88%

Drawdowns

DFCF vs. DFAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFCF drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum DFAC drawdown of -23.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCF and DFAC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFCFDFACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-23.12%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

-12.79%

+9.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-5.94%

+4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-5.62%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.71%

-1.78%

Volatility

DFCF vs. DFAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) is 1.85%, while Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that DFCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFCFDFACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

5.31%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

9.59%

-6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68%

18.51%

-13.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

17.30%

-10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.54%

17.30%

-10.76%