PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAX vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAX vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.


DFAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.89%
YTD
15.23%
6M
18.11%
1Y
34.96%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAX vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
15.23%35.42%4.78%16.66%-14.48%-2.68%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%8.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAX and YCS is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

-0.23

The correlation between DFAX and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.41 (1 year) to -0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAX vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAX vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAXYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.97

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

12.40

+0.10

DFAX vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAX and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAXYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

1.92

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.33

+0.32

Drawdowns

DFAX vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAXYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-49.56%

+21.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-8.30%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-23.05%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

0.00%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-19.93%

+13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.66%

+0.14%

Volatility

DFAX vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that DFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAXYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

2.75%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

12.32%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

17.27%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

21.10%

-5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

19.01%

-3.02%

DFAX vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAX vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.22%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAX and YCS have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, DFAX leads with 20.90% vs 19.84% for YCS. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAX has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 19.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

DFAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

DFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. DFAX tracks MSCI All Country World ex USA Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DFAX and 1.00% for YCS.

DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAX and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer