DFAX vs. KEMX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFAX is actively managed, while KEMX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAX returned 20.27%/yr vs 28.29%/yr for KEMX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAX charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

DFAX vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 38.34% return.

DFAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 6M: 12.55%
• 1Y: 29.76%
• 3Y*: 20.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEMX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 38.34%
• 6M: 39.79%
• 1Y: 66.69%
• 3Y*: 28.29%
• 5Y*: 13.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAX vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF	12.82%	35.42%	4.78%	16.66%	-14.48%	-2.10%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	38.34%	38.28%	0.36%	20.57%	-19.35%	0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAX and KEMX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021	0.86

The correlation between DFAX and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAX vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFAX	KEMX
Technology	19.1%	46.8%
Financial Services	17.7%	18.7%
Industrials	17.4%	7.6%
Basic Materials	10.6%	7.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	5.5%
Energy	6.1%	4.0%
Healthcare	5.8%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	2.6%
Communication Services	4.3%	2.9%
Utilities	2.9%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.0%

Return for Risk

DFAX vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAX

DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 63
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 87
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAX vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFAX	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.67	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	3.22	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.48	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	4.37	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.42	16.52	-6.11

DFAX vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAX and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFAX vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAX	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.15%	-38.80%	+10.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.11%	-15.36%	+4.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.89%	-19.62%	+5.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.07%	-5.84%	+2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.62%	-8.82%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	4.05%	-1.19%

Volatility

DFAX vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) is 7.02%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 13.53%. This indicates that DFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAX	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	13.53%	-6.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.13%	23.18%	-9.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	25.26%	-9.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.16%	18.96%	-2.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.16%	21.33%	-5.17%

DFAX vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAX vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, which matches KEMX's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF	2.35%	2.58%	2.98%	3.01%	3.30%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.37%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAX and KEMX in my portfolio?

DFAX and KEMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFAX or KEMX?

KEMX has higher volatility (13.53%) compared to DFAX (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

Which ETF is better, DFAX or KEMX?

On 3-year performance, KEMX leads with 28.29% vs 20.27% for DFAX. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DFAX has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFAX or KEMX?

Over the 3-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 28.29% return vs 20.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFAX or KEMX?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DFAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFAX or KEMX?

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 2.35% for DFAX.

What is the main difference between DFAX and KEMX?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DFAX and 0.25% for KEMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.