PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAX vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAX vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.


DFAX

1D
0.47%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
13.35%
6M
13.07%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
16.93%
6M
16.46%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAX vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFAX and IFLO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.88

DFAX vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAX
IFLO

Technology

19.1%
21.5%

Financial Services

17.7%
1.1%

Industrials

17.4%
18.1%

Basic Materials

10.6%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
13.8%

Energy

6.1%
12.1%

Healthcare

5.8%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
2.8%

Communication Services

4.3%
6.7%

Utilities

2.9%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.0%

Technology

DFAX
19.1%
IFLO
21.5%

Financial Services

DFAX
17.7%
IFLO
1.1%

Industrials

DFAX
17.4%
IFLO
18.1%

Basic Materials

DFAX
10.6%
IFLO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAX
9.5%
IFLO
13.8%

Energy

DFAX
6.1%
IFLO
12.1%

Healthcare

DFAX
5.8%
IFLO
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

DFAX
4.8%
IFLO
2.8%

Communication Services

DFAX
4.3%
IFLO
6.7%

Utilities

DFAX
2.9%
IFLO
1.0%

Real Estate

DFAX
1.9%
IFLO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAX vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAX vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAXIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.63

DFAX vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAX vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAXIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-6.44%

-21.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-6.44%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-3.37%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-1.25%

-5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

Volatility

DFAX vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAXIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.95%

14.75%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

14.75%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.15%

14.75%

+1.40%

DFAX vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAX vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.34%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
1.51%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAX and IFLO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs 30.41% for DFAX. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 30.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAX is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

DFAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DFAX and 0.56% for IFLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAX and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer