PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAX vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAX vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than IDOG's 14.02% return.


DFAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.89%
YTD
15.23%
6M
18.11%
1Y
34.96%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
10Y*

IDOG

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.24%
YTD
14.02%
6M
16.64%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAX vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
15.23%35.42%4.78%16.66%-14.48%-2.68%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.02%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%-0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAX and IDOG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.87

The correlation between DFAX and IDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAX vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAX
IDOG

Financial Services

17.9%
11.0%

Industrials

16.1%
11.7%

Basic Materials

13.2%
10.0%

Technology

10.9%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
9.5%

Energy

6.6%
10.7%

Healthcare

5.6%
9.3%

Utilities

4.2%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
9.4%

Communication Services

3.5%
9.9%

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Financial Services

DFAX
17.9%
IDOG
11.0%

Industrials

DFAX
16.1%
IDOG
11.7%

Basic Materials

DFAX
13.2%
IDOG
10.0%

Technology

DFAX
10.9%
IDOG
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAX
10.9%
IDOG
9.5%

Energy

DFAX
6.6%
IDOG
10.7%

Healthcare

DFAX
5.6%
IDOG
9.3%

Utilities

DFAX
4.2%
IDOG
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

DFAX
3.9%
IDOG
9.4%

Communication Services

DFAX
3.5%
IDOG
9.9%

Real Estate

DFAX
3.1%
IDOG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAX vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAX vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAXIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

5.51

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

19.31

-6.82

DFAX vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAX and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAXIDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.68

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.51

+0.13

Drawdowns

DFAX vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, smaller than the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAXIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-37.32%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-6.47%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-13.92%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.47%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-7.93%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

1.84%

+0.96%

Volatility

DFAX vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.13%. This indicates that DFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAXIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

4.13%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

10.09%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

13.33%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

15.61%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

17.45%

-1.46%

DFAX vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAX vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than IDOG's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.22%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.42%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAX and IDOG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to IDOG (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 3-year performance, IDOG leads with 21.96% vs 20.90% for DFAX. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 21.96% return vs 20.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.22% for DFAX.

DFAX tracks MSCI All Country World ex USA Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DFAX and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAX and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer