PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAX vs. DFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAX vs. DFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than DFUS's 11.25% return.


DFAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.89%
YTD
15.23%
6M
18.11%
1Y
34.96%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
10Y*

DFUS

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.19%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAX vs. DFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
15.23%35.42%4.78%16.66%-14.48%-2.68%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
11.25%17.46%24.34%26.36%-18.34%6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAX and DFUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.76

The correlation between DFAX and DFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAX vs. DFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAX
DFUS

Financial Services

17.9%
20.2%

Industrials

16.1%
9.5%

Basic Materials

13.2%
1.1%

Technology

10.9%
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
13.0%

Energy

6.6%
5.3%

Healthcare

5.6%
4.1%

Utilities

4.2%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
2.6%

Communication Services

3.5%
23.5%

Real Estate

3.1%
0.0%

Financial Services

DFAX
17.9%
DFUS
20.2%

Industrials

DFAX
16.1%
DFUS
9.5%

Basic Materials

DFAX
13.2%
DFUS
1.1%

Technology

DFAX
10.9%
DFUS
17.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAX
10.9%
DFUS
13.0%

Energy

DFAX
6.6%
DFUS
5.3%

Healthcare

DFAX
5.6%
DFUS
4.1%

Utilities

DFAX
4.2%
DFUS
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

DFAX
3.9%
DFUS
2.6%

Communication Services

DFAX
3.5%
DFUS
23.5%

Real Estate

DFAX
3.1%
DFUS
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAX vs. DFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAX vs. DFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAXDFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.21

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

14.70

-2.20

DFAX vs. DFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the DFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAX and DFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAXDFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.35

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.79

-0.14

Drawdowns

DFAX vs. DFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, which is greater than DFUS's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and DFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAXDFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-24.62%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-8.96%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-19.44%

+5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.66%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-5.82%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

1.95%

+0.85%

Volatility

DFAX vs. DFUS - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) at 3.07%. This indicates that DFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAXDFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

3.07%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.67%

9.18%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

12.23%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

17.21%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

17.21%

-1.22%

DFAX vs. DFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUS's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAX vs. DFUS - Dividend Comparison

DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than DFUS's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.22%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
0.83%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAX and DFUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to DFUS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs DFUS's -24.62%.

On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.42% vs 20.90% for DFAX. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.42% return vs 20.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DFAX.

DFAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.83% for DFUS.

DFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DFAX and 0.09% for DFUS.

DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAX and DFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer