DFAX vs. DFUS
DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) and DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index, while DFUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. DFAX is passively managed, while DFUS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAX returned 20.90%/yr vs 22.42%/yr for DFUS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DFUS.
Performance
DFAX vs. DFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than DFUS's 11.25% return.
DFAX
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 34.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFUS
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAX vs. DFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 15.23% | 35.42% | 4.78% | 16.66% | -14.48% | -2.68% |
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.46% | 24.34% | 26.36% | -18.34% | 6.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAX and DFUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between DFAX and DFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAX vs. DFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAX
DFUS
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAX
DFUS
Industrials
DFAX
DFUS
Basic Materials
DFAX
DFUS
Technology
DFAX
DFUS
Consumer Cyclical
DFAX
DFUS
Energy
DFAX
DFUS
Healthcare
DFAX
DFUS
Utilities
DFAX
DFUS
Consumer Defensive
DFAX
DFUS
Communication Services
DFAX
DFUS
Real Estate
DFAX
DFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAX vs. DFUS — Risk / Return Rank
DFAX
DFUS
DFAX vs. DFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAX | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.21 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.50 | 14.70 | -2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAX | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.35 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.79 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
DFAX vs. DFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, which is greater than DFUS's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and DFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAX | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -24.62% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.11% | -8.96% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -19.44% | +5.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.66% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -5.82% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.95% | +0.85% |
Volatility
DFAX vs. DFUS - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) at 3.07%. This indicates that DFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAX | DFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 3.07% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 9.18% | +3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 12.23% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 17.21% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 17.21% | -1.22% |
DFAX vs. DFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUS's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAX vs. DFUS - Dividend Comparison
DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than DFUS's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.98% | 3.01% | 3.30% | 1.40% |
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.48% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAX and DFUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to DFUS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs DFUS's -24.62%.
On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.42% vs 20.90% for DFAX. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.42% return vs 20.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DFAX.
DFAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.83% for DFUS.
DFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DFAX and 0.09% for DFUS.
DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAX and DFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer