DFAX vs. BKIE

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFAX is actively managed, while BKIE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAX returned 20.27%/yr vs 17.18%/yr for BKIE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAX charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.

Performance

DFAX vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 7.83% return.

DFAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 6M: 12.55%
• 1Y: 29.76%
• 3Y*: 20.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKIE

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 7.83%
• 6M: 7.45%
• 1Y: 21.10%
• 3Y*: 17.18%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAX vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF	12.82%	35.42%	4.78%	16.66%	-14.48%	-2.10%
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	7.83%	32.08%	4.63%	18.25%	-13.60%	-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAX and BKIE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021	0.95

The correlation between DFAX and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAX vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFAX	BKIE
Technology	19.1%	10.9%
Financial Services	17.7%	25.9%
Industrials	17.4%	18.2%
Basic Materials	10.6%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	7.4%
Energy	6.1%	5.5%
Healthcare	5.8%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	6.2%
Communication Services	4.3%	4.4%
Utilities	2.9%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

DFAX vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAX

DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 63
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

BKIE

BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 44
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAX vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFAX	BKIE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.40	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	2.02	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	1.86	+0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.42	7.14	+3.27

DFAX vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAX and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFAX vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, roughly equal to the maximum BKIE drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and BKIE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAX	BKIE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.15%	-28.19%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.11%	-11.41%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.89%	-13.19%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.07%	-2.20%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.62%	-4.94%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	2.96%	-0.10%

Volatility

DFAX vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.96%. This indicates that DFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAX	BKIE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	4.96%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.13%	12.84%	+1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	15.13%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.16%	16.20%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.16%	16.36%	-0.20%

DFAX vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAX vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than BKIE's 3.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	3.28%	3.12%	3.31%	2.88%	2.97%	2.58%	1.49%
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF	2.35%	2.58%	2.98%	3.01%	3.30%	1.40%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAX and BKIE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, DFAX and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFAX or BKIE?

DFAX has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to BKIE (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAX dropped -28.15% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

Which ETF is better, DFAX or BKIE?

On 3-year performance, DFAX leads with 20.27% vs 17.18% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFAX or BKIE?

Over the 3-year period, DFAX has performed better with a 20.27% return vs 17.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFAX or BKIE?

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DFAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFAX or BKIE?

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.35% for DFAX.

What is the main difference between DFAX and BKIE?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DFAX and 0.04% for BKIE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.