DFAW vs. PID

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFAW (Dimensional World Equity ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds. DFAW is actively managed, while PID is passively managed. Over the past year, DFAW returned 30.13% vs 16.04% for PID. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.

Performance

DFAW vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAW achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 5.45% return.

DFAW

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 13.91%
• 1Y: 30.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PID

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 5.45%
• 6M: 6.61%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAW vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	12.61%	20.62%	15.49%	11.57%
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	5.45%	24.45%	3.08%	10.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAW and PID is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.72

The correlation between DFAW and PID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAW vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFAW	PID
Technology	24.8%	8.7%
Financial Services	15.5%	17.5%
Industrials	13.6%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	6.4%
Healthcare	7.9%	8.4%
Communication Services	7.3%	13.8%
Energy	6.0%	13.3%
Basic Materials	5.0%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	6.0%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.4%
Utilities	2.3%	14.2%

Return for Risk

DFAW vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAW

DFAW Risk / Return Rank: 74
DFAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DFAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DFAW Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DFAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DFAW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

PID

PID Risk / Return Rank: 46
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAW vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFAW	PID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	1.66	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	2.46	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.30	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	2.16	+1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.09	7.36	+7.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFAW vs. PID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the PID Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAW and PID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFAW	PID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	1.66	+0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	0.27	+1.35

Drawdowns

DFAW vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAW drawdown since its inception was -16.93%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAW and PID.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAW	PID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-66.34%	+49.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.88%	-7.47%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-2.19%	+1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-13.04%	+11.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	2.18%	-0.18%

Volatility

DFAW vs. PID - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.75%. This indicates that DFAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAW	PID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	2.75%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.39%	7.62%	+1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.03%	9.70%	+2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.46%	13.97%	+0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.46%	17.84%	-3.38%

DFAW vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAW vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

DFAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than PID's 3.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	1.55%	1.71%	1.47%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.27%	3.28%	3.88%	3.31%	3.30%	3.30%	3.16%	3.99%	3.87%	3.46%	3.90%	4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAW and PID in my portfolio?

DFAW and PID have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFAW or PID?

DFAW has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAW dropped -16.93% vs PID's -66.34%.

Which ETF is better, DFAW or PID?

On 1-year performance, DFAW leads with 30.13% vs 16.04% for PID. On fees, DFAW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFAW or PID?

Over the 1-year period, DFAW has performed better with a 30.13% return vs 16.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFAW or PID?

DFAW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFAW or PID?

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.55% for DFAW.

What is the main difference between DFAW and PID?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DFAW and 0.56% for PID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.