DFAW vs. DXUV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV).

DFAW and DXUV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFAW is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023. DXUV is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 10, 2024.

Performance

DFAW vs. DXUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DFAW vs. DXUV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	0.66%	20.62%	2.67%
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	0.02%	14.34%	5.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAW achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than DXUV's 0.02% return.

DFAW

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -4.68%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 4.05%
• 1Y: 23.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DXUV

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -4.58%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 19.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAW vs. DXUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFAW and DXUV have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

DFAW

Dimensional World Equity ETF

DXUV

Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF

Return for Risk

DFAW vs. DXUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAW

DFAW Risk / Return Rank: 75
DFAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DFAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DFAW Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DFAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DFAW Martin Ratio Rank: 80

DXUV

DXUV Risk / Return Rank: 55
DXUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
DXUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
DXUV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DXUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
DXUV Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAW vs. DXUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFAW	DXUV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.01	+0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	1.55	+0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.23	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.50	+0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.17	6.77	+2.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFAW vs. DXUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the DXUV Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAW and DXUV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFAW	DXUV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	1.01	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	0.71	+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between DFAW and DXUV is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DFAW vs. DXUV - Dividend Comparison

DFAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than DXUV's 1.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	1.73%	1.71%	1.47%	0.42%
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF	1.07%	1.01%	0.37%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DFAW vs. DXUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAW drawdown since its inception was -16.93%, smaller than the maximum DXUV drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAW and DXUV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAW	DXUV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-21.08%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.24%	-13.38%	+1.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.51%	-5.66%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.76%	-3.32%	+1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	2.96%	-0.40%

Volatility

DFAW vs. DXUV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) at 5.07%. This indicates that DFAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAW	DXUV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.67%	5.07%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.47%	9.84%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.15%	19.40%	-2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.57%	17.86%	-3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.57%	17.86%	-3.29%