DFAT vs. VIOV
DFAT (Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF) and VIOV (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. DFAT is actively managed, while VIOV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAT returned 16.49%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for VIOV. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VIOV.
Performance
DFAT vs. VIOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAT achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than VIOV's 15.28% return.
DFAT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 30.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIOV
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
DFAT vs. VIOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 13.26% | 8.73% | 7.80% | 20.86% | -6.23% | 5.08% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 15.28% | 6.63% | 7.44% | 15.36% | -11.37% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAT and VIOV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DFAT and VIOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAT vs. VIOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAT
VIOV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
DFAT
VIOV
Industrials
DFAT
VIOV
Consumer Cyclical
DFAT
VIOV
Energy
DFAT
VIOV
Technology
DFAT
VIOV
Consumer Defensive
DFAT
VIOV
Healthcare
DFAT
VIOV
Basic Materials
DFAT
VIOV
Communication Services
DFAT
VIOV
Real Estate
DFAT
VIOV
Utilities
DFAT
VIOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAT vs. VIOV — Risk / Return Rank
DFAT
VIOV
DFAT vs. VIOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAT | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.99 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.13 | 13.00 | -2.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAT | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.03 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
DFAT vs. VIOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAT drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum VIOV drawdown of -47.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAT and VIOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAT | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -47.36% | +21.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -9.33% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.12% | -28.44% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -1.28% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -7.38% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.86% | +0.11% |
Volatility
DFAT vs. VIOV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) is 4.06%, while Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that DFAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAT | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 4.54% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 11.57% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 18.41% | -1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 21.95% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 23.89% | -2.41% |
DFAT vs. VIOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAT vs. VIOV - Dividend Comparison
DFAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than VIOV's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 1.45% | 1.55% | 1.31% | 1.34% | 1.34% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 1.59% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DFAT and VIOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VIOV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to DFAT (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAT dropped -26.12% vs VIOV's -47.36%.
On 3-year performance, DFAT leads with 16.49% vs 14.29% for VIOV. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DFAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAT has performed better with a 16.49% return vs 14.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DFAT.
VIOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.45% for DFAT.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DFAT and 0.10% for VIOV.
VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAT and VIOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer