DFAT vs. SMCF
DFAT (Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF) and SMCF (Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. DFAT is actively managed, while SMCF is passively managed. Over the past year, DFAT returned 30.02% vs 32.87% for SMCF. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SMCF.
Performance
DFAT vs. SMCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFAT having a 13.26% return and SMCF slightly higher at 13.75%.
DFAT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 30.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCF
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 32.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAT vs. SMCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 13.26% | 8.73% | 7.80% | 4.44% |
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 13.75% | 9.56% | 16.30% | 4.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAT and SMCF is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DFAT and SMCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAT vs. SMCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAT
SMCF
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DFAT
SMCF
Industrials
DFAT
SMCF
Consumer Cyclical
DFAT
SMCF
Energy
DFAT
SMCF
Technology
DFAT
SMCF
Consumer Defensive
DFAT
SMCF
Healthcare
DFAT
SMCF
Basic Materials
DFAT
SMCF
Communication Services
DFAT
SMCF
Real Estate
DFAT
SMCF
Utilities
DFAT
SMCF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAT vs. SMCF — Risk / Return Rank
DFAT
SMCF
DFAT vs. SMCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAT | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 4.63 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.13 | 12.46 | -2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAT | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.05 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.91 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
DFAT vs. SMCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAT drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum SMCF drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAT and SMCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAT | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -28.48% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -7.13% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -2.44% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -5.29% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.65% | +0.32% |
Volatility
DFAT vs. SMCF - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) at 3.55%. This indicates that DFAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAT | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 3.55% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 10.00% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 16.18% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 20.31% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 20.31% | +1.17% |
DFAT vs. SMCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAT vs. SMCF - Dividend Comparison
DFAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than SMCF's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 1.45% | 1.55% | 1.31% | 1.34% | 1.34% | 1.13% |
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 3.44% | 3.91% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAT and SMCF have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAT has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to SMCF (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAT dropped -26.12% vs SMCF's -28.48%.
On 1-year performance, SMCF leads with 32.87% vs 30.02% for DFAT. On fees, DFAT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SMCF has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMCF has performed better with a 32.87% return vs 30.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SMCF.
SMCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.45% for DFAT.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DFAT and 0.29% for SMCF.
SMCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAT and SMCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer