DFAT vs. ITOT
DFAT (Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAT is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. DFAT is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAT returned 16.49%/yr vs 22.09%/yr for ITOT. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
DFAT vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAT achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.25% return.
DFAT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 30.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
DFAT vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 13.26% | 8.73% | 7.80% | 20.86% | -6.23% | 5.08% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 10.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAT and ITOT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between DFAT and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFAT vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAT
ITOT
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
DFAT
ITOT
Industrials
DFAT
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
DFAT
ITOT
Energy
DFAT
ITOT
Technology
DFAT
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
DFAT
ITOT
Healthcare
DFAT
ITOT
Basic Materials
DFAT
ITOT
Communication Services
DFAT
ITOT
Real Estate
DFAT
ITOT
Utilities
DFAT
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAT vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
DFAT
ITOT
DFAT vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAT | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.17 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.13 | 14.57 | -4.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAT | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.32 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.57 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
DFAT vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAT drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAT and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAT | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -55.20% | +29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -8.90% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.12% | -19.44% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.73% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -6.97% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 1.94% | +1.03% |
Volatility
DFAT vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that DFAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAT | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 2.99% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 9.13% | +1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 12.20% | +4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 17.36% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 18.26% | +3.22% |
DFAT vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAT vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
DFAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than ITOT's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 1.45% | 1.55% | 1.31% | 1.34% | 1.34% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAT and ITOT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAT has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAT dropped -26.12% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.09% vs 16.49% for DFAT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.09% return vs 16.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DFAT.
DFAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.98% for ITOT.
DFAT is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DFAT and 0.03% for ITOT.
ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAT and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer