PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAS vs. VBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAS vs. VBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly higher than VBK's 12.94% return.


DFAS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.61%
6M
10.95%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
29.19%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.93%

VBK

1D
-0.27%
1M
-4.86%
6M
9.06%
YTD
12.94%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
10.90%
ALL TIME*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.83M$42.77M$37.37M
$67.40M$71.27M$83.02M

DFAS vs. VBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
16.93%8.17%10.21%17.83%-13.84%4.52%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
12.94%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%-0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAS and VBK is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.91

The correlation between DFAS and VBK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAS vs. VBK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAS
VBK

Financial Services

19.6%
5.7%

Industrials

19.0%
23.4%

Technology

14.7%
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
8.9%

Healthcare

13.0%
17.9%

Energy

5.9%
3.4%

Basic Materials

4.8%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
2.0%

Utilities

2.7%
1.1%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
3.7%

Financial Services

DFAS
19.6%
VBK
5.7%

Industrials

DFAS
19.0%
VBK
23.4%

Technology

DFAS
14.7%
VBK
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAS
13.1%
VBK
8.9%

Healthcare

DFAS
13.0%
VBK
17.9%

Energy

DFAS
5.9%
VBK
3.4%

Basic Materials

DFAS
4.8%
VBK
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

DFAS
4.2%
VBK
2.0%

Utilities

DFAS
2.7%
VBK
1.1%

Communication Services

DFAS
2.5%
VBK
3.6%

Real Estate

DFAS
0.7%
VBK
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAS vs. VBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFAS
DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFAS vs. VBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFASVBKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.18

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

1.86

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

6.29

+3.80

DFAS vs. VBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the VBK Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAS and VBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAS vs. VBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum VBK drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and VBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFASVBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

-58.68%

+32.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-11.44%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.13%

-27.54%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.13%

-38.39%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-6.90%

+5.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-10.10%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.37%

-0.70%

Volatility

DFAS vs. VBK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) is 3.36%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that DFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFASVBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

5.16%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

15.93%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

20.39%

-3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

23.65%

-2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.66%

22.91%

-2.25%

DFAS vs. VBK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAS has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than VBK's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFAS vs. VBK - Dividend Comparison

DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than VBK's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
0.98%0.99%0.93%1.00%1.03%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAS and VBK have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBK has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to DFAS (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs VBK's -58.68%.

On 5-year performance, DFAS leads with 8.65% vs 4.14% for VBK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFAS has performed better with a 8.65% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DFAS.

DFAS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.

DFAS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VBK is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DFAS and 0.05% for VBK.

DFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAS and VBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer