PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAS vs. DFAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAS vs. DFAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly higher than DFAI's 12.02% return.


DFAS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.61%
6M
10.95%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
29.19%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.93%

DFAI

1D
-0.64%
1M
1.25%
6M
6.62%
YTD
12.02%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$73.27M$69.05M$61.26M
$35.83M$42.77M$37.37M

DFAS vs. DFAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
16.93%8.17%10.21%17.83%-13.84%4.52%
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
12.02%34.04%4.68%17.60%-12.95%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAS and DFAI is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.75

The correlation between DFAS and DFAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAS vs. DFAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAS
DFAI

Financial Services

19.6%
23.1%

Industrials

19.0%
19.1%

Technology

14.7%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
8.6%

Healthcare

13.0%
8.8%

Energy

5.9%
5.8%

Basic Materials

4.8%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
6.4%

Utilities

2.7%
3.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.4%

Financial Services

DFAS
19.6%
DFAI
23.1%

Industrials

DFAS
19.0%
DFAI
19.1%

Technology

DFAS
14.7%
DFAI
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAS
13.1%
DFAI
8.6%

Healthcare

DFAS
13.0%
DFAI
8.8%

Energy

DFAS
5.9%
DFAI
5.8%

Basic Materials

DFAS
4.8%
DFAI
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

DFAS
4.2%
DFAI
6.4%

Utilities

DFAS
2.7%
DFAI
3.8%

Communication Services

DFAS
2.5%
DFAI
3.6%

Real Estate

DFAS
0.7%
DFAI
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAS vs. DFAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFAS
DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFAS vs. DFAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFASDFAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

2.44

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

9.59

+0.50

DFAS vs. DFAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the DFAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAS and DFAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAS vs. DFAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, roughly equal to the maximum DFAI drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and DFAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFASDFAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

-27.44%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-10.95%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.13%

-13.25%

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.13%

-27.44%

+1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.64%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-5.01%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.78%

-0.11%

Volatility

DFAS vs. DFAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) is 3.36%, while Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that DFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFASDFAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

4.24%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

12.66%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

14.65%

+2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

16.00%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.66%

15.69%

+4.97%

DFAS vs. DFAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAS has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAI's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFAS vs. DFAI - Dividend Comparison

DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than DFAI's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.30%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
0.98%0.99%0.93%1.00%1.03%2.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAS and DFAI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAI has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to DFAS (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs DFAI's -27.44%.

On 5-year performance, DFAI leads with 10.32% vs 8.65% for DFAS. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFAI has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DFAS.

DFAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 0.98% for DFAS.

DFAS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DFAI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DFAS and 0.18% for DFAI.

DFAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAS and DFAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer