DFAR vs. PDBC
DFAR (Dimensional US Real Estate ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAR is a REIT fund actively managed by Dimensional, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAR returned 10.91%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for PDBC. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DFAR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
DFAR vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAR achieves a 17.43% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 28.15% return.
DFAR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- YTD
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.60%
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 18.25%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 1Y
- 35.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $70.38M | $64.44M | $64.02M | |
| $121.86M | $152.61M | $122.20M |
DFAR vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 17.43% | 1.31% | 5.25% | 11.04% | -12.16% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 28.15% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 4.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAR and PDBC is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.04 |
The correlation between DFAR and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAR vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
DFAR
PDBC
DFAR vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAR | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.16 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 7.07 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAR vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAR drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAR and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAR | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.27% | -49.52% | +17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -16.55% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -16.55% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -10.21% | +7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.70% | -23.02% | +9.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 5.05% | -2.55% |
Volatility
DFAR vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) is 4.08%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that DFAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAR | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 7.58% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 16.65% | -5.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 19.73% | -6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 19.28% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 17.85% | +1.21% |
DFAR vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAR vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
DFAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than PDBC's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 2.64% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 3.06% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.00% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAR and PDBC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to DFAR (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAR dropped -32.27% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 3-year performance, DFAR leads with 10.91% vs 9.41% for PDBC. On fees, DFAR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DFAR has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAR has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 2.64% for DFAR.
DFAR is categorized as REIT, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DFAR and 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAR and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer