PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAR vs. DFIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFAR vs. DFIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFAR vs. DFIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
3.46%1.31%5.25%11.04%-17.66%
DFIC
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
3.32%37.09%4.10%17.32%-9.27%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFAR having a 3.46% return and DFIC slightly lower at 3.32%.


DFAR

1D
1.55%
1M
-6.28%
YTD
3.46%
6M
0.97%
1Y
2.53%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
10Y*

DFIC

1D
3.02%
1M
-7.56%
YTD
3.32%
6M
9.34%
1Y
31.43%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFAR vs. DFIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIC's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFAR vs. DFIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAR
DFAR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DFAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAR Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIC
DFIC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAR vs. DFIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFARDFICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.16

1.93

-1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.32

2.57

-2.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.40

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

2.75

-2.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.16

11.02

-9.86

DFAR vs. DFIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the DFIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAR and DFIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFARDFICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

1.93

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.74

-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between DFAR and DFIC is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DFAR vs. DFIC - Dividend Comparison

DFAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than DFIC's 2.43% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
2.98%2.97%2.89%3.06%1.69%
DFIC
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
2.43%2.54%2.87%2.55%1.47%

Drawdowns

DFAR vs. DFIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAR drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, which is greater than DFIC's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAR and DFIC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFARDFICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.27%

-24.40%

-7.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-11.00%

-1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.75%

-7.56%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-4.64%

-10.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.74%

+0.39%

Volatility

DFAR vs. DFIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) is 4.48%, while DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that DFAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFARDFICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

7.20%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

10.43%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

16.43%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

16.19%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

16.19%

+3.13%