DFAPX vs. UMMGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFAPX (DFA Investment Grade Portfolio) and UMMGX (Columbia Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAPX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for UMMGX.

Performance

DFAPX vs. UMMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DFAPX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 0.43%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: 4.56%
• 5Y*: 0.63%
• 10Y*: 2.03%

UMMGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAPX vs. UMMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFAPX DFA Investment Grade Portfolio	0.65%	7.22%	1.81%	6.84%	-12.92%	-1.57%	9.19%	9.97%	-0.24%	3.37%
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund	0.03%	8.03%	2.06%	6.73%	-15.66%	-0.79%	9.10%	9.23%	-0.50%	3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAPX and UMMGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012	0.89

The correlation between DFAPX and UMMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFAPX vs. UMMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAPX

DFAPX Risk / Return Rank: 27
DFAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
DFAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
DFAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
DFAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DFAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAPX vs. UMMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFAPX	UMMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.04	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFAPX	UMMGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAPX	UMMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.47%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFAPX	UMMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.82%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.88%	—	—

DFAPX vs. UMMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAPX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMGX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAPX vs. UMMGX - Dividend Comparison

DFAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than UMMGX's 3.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFAPX DFA Investment Grade Portfolio	3.74%	3.78%	3.79%	3.31%	2.62%	3.31%	2.14%	2.59%	2.67%	2.21%	2.12%	2.45%
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund	3.41%	4.20%	3.70%	3.73%	2.73%	1.76%	4.77%	4.21%	2.71%	1.88%	4.66%	3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAPX and UMMGX in my portfolio?

DFAPX and UMMGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.