PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFALX vs. IWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFALX vs. IWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Large Cap International Portfolio (DFALX) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFALX achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than IWD's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, DFALX has underperformed IWD with an annualized return of 9.57%, while IWD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.13% annualized return.


DFALX

1D
-2.41%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
7.88%
6M
10.41%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
9.57%

IWD

1D
0.36%
1M
1.44%
YTD
13.23%
6M
14.44%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFALX vs. IWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFALX
DFA Large Cap International Portfolio
7.88%33.60%4.55%17.88%-13.04%12.79%8.13%22.05%-14.15%25.35%
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
13.23%15.68%14.17%11.34%-7.75%24.95%2.73%26.12%-8.45%13.45%

Correlation

The correlation between DFALX and IWD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000

0.74

The correlation between DFALX and IWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFALX vs. IWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFALX
DFALX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DFALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFALX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFALX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

IWD
IWD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFALX vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Large Cap International Portfolio (DFALX) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFALXIWDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.44

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.93

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

16.40

-8.04

DFALX vs. IWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the IWD Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFALX and IWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFALXIWDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.44

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.69

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.65

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.42

-0.05

Drawdowns

DFALX vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFALX drawdown since its inception was -59.76%, roughly equal to the maximum IWD drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFALX and IWD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFALXIWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.76%

-60.10%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-6.79%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.11%

-15.71%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.52%

-19.04%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.58%

-38.51%

+2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-1.56%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.00%

-8.65%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

1.62%

+1.12%

Volatility

DFALX vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison

DFA Large Cap International Portfolio (DFALX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) at 3.18%. This indicates that DFALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFALXIWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.18%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

8.30%

+3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

10.94%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

14.83%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

17.30%

-1.11%

DFALX vs. IWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFALX and IWD have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFALX vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison

DFALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than IWD's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFALX
DFA Large Cap International Portfolio
2.80%2.89%3.18%3.24%2.86%3.00%1.88%2.88%3.07%2.55%2.89%2.94%
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.51%1.69%1.87%2.02%2.15%1.62%2.05%2.45%2.71%2.09%2.25%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFALX and IWD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFALX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to IWD (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFALX dropped -59.76% vs IWD's -60.10%.

IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFALX and IWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer