PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAI vs. TRIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAI vs. TRIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund (TRIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than TRIGX's 13.20% return.


DFAI

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.30%
6M
6.75%
YTD
10.53%
1Y
24.11%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*

TRIGX

1D
0.75%
1M
1.01%
6M
8.64%
YTD
13.20%
1Y
30.13%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAI vs. TRIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
10.53%34.04%4.68%17.60%-12.95%13.86%5.34%
TRIGX
T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund
13.20%43.90%7.85%19.18%-8.45%12.77%5.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAI and TRIGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.96

The correlation between DFAI and TRIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAI vs. TRIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIGX
TRIGX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TRIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAI vs. TRIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund (TRIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAITRIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.50

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

8.85

-0.27

DFAI vs. TRIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the TRIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAI and TRIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAI vs. TRIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum TRIGX drawdown of -62.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and TRIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAITRIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-62.28%

+34.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-12.16%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-14.25%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

-27.37%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.70%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-12.61%

+7.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

3.43%

-0.61%

Volatility

DFAI vs. TRIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) is 3.47%, while T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund (TRIGX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that DFAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAITRIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.92%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

13.33%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

15.51%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

15.97%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

16.72%

-1.03%

DFAI vs. TRIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TRIGX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAI vs. TRIGX - Dividend Comparison

DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than TRIGX's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.33%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRIGX
T.Rowe Price International Value Equity Fund
2.45%2.78%2.58%2.66%2.98%2.49%1.34%2.82%2.49%0.26%2.65%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DFAI and TRIGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRIGX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to DFAI (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs TRIGX's -62.28%.

TRIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAI and TRIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer