PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAI vs. GMOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAI vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAI achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than GMOI's 11.52% return.


DFAI

1D
-2.83%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
7.50%
6M
6.97%
1Y
23.12%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*

GMOI

1D
-1.03%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
11.52%
6M
11.19%
1Y
35.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAI vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
7.50%34.04%-4.00%
GMOI
GMO International Value ETF
11.52%45.64%-4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAI and GMOI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024

0.92

The correlation between DFAI and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAI vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

GMOI
GMOI Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GMOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAI vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFAIGMOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.47

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

4.23

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

16.65

-8.40

DFAI vs. GMOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the GMOI Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAI and GMOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAI vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAI drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than GMOI's maximum drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAI and GMOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAIGMOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-14.67%

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-8.36%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-2.63%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-1.69%

-3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.12%

+0.69%

Volatility

DFAI vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) at 3.99%. This indicates that DFAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAIGMOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

3.99%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

10.67%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.77%

13.40%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

15.57%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

15.57%

+0.20%

DFAI vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAI vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison

DFAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than GMOI's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.29%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%
GMOI
GMO International Value ETF
2.45%2.74%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DFAI and GMOI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFAI has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to GMOI (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAI dropped -27.44% vs GMOI's -14.67%.

On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 35.21% vs 23.12% for DFAI. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, GMOI has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 35.21% return vs 23.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.

GMOI has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 2.29% for DFAI.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DFAI and 0.60% for GMOI.

GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAI and GMOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer