DFAC vs. SCHD
DFAC (Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. DFAC is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFAC returned 11.69%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for SCHD. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAC charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
DFAC vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAC achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return.
DFAC
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 25.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
DFAC vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 10.46% | 15.66% | 19.61% | 21.96% | -14.93% | 9.55% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 6.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAC and SCHD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DFAC and SCHD has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DFAC vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAC
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
DFAC
SCHD
Financial Services
DFAC
SCHD
Industrials
DFAC
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
DFAC
SCHD
Healthcare
DFAC
SCHD
Communication Services
DFAC
SCHD
Energy
DFAC
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
DFAC
SCHD
Basic Materials
DFAC
SCHD
Utilities
DFAC
SCHD
Real Estate
DFAC
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAC vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
DFAC
SCHD
DFAC vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAC | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 5.35 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.40 | 12.94 | +0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAC vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAC drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAC and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAC | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -33.37% | +10.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -4.61% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.02% | -16.13% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -16.85% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -2.47% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -3.31% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.90% | +0.04% |
Volatility
DFAC vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that DFAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAC | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 3.58% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 7.73% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 11.07% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 14.36% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 16.71% | +0.43% |
DFAC vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAC has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFAC vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
DFAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 0.92% | 0.97% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.50% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAC and SCHD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAC has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAC dropped -23.12% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, DFAC leads with 11.69% vs 8.71% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFAC has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DFAC.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.92% for DFAC.
DFAC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DFAC and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAC and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer