DEXC vs. SPEM
DEXC (Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF) and SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. DEXC is actively managed, while SPEM is passively managed. Over the past year, DEXC returned 39.06% vs 22.14% for SPEM. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DEXC charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPEM.
Performance
DEXC vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEXC achieves a 22.11% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 9.89% return.
DEXC
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 22.11%
- 1Y
- 39.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.12%
SPEM
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 1Y
- 22.14%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.25M | $1.39M | $1.60M | |
| $90.49M | $105.53M | $120.92M |
DEXC vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF | 22.11% | 27.13% | -1.63% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 9.89% | 25.63% | -1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEXC and SPEM is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2024 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DEXC and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEXC vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEXC
SPEM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DEXC
SPEM
Financial Services
DEXC
SPEM
Industrials
DEXC
SPEM
Basic Materials
DEXC
SPEM
Consumer Cyclical
DEXC
SPEM
Communication Services
DEXC
SPEM
Consumer Defensive
DEXC
SPEM
Energy
DEXC
SPEM
Healthcare
DEXC
SPEM
Utilities
DEXC
SPEM
Real Estate
DEXC
SPEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEXC vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank
DEXC
SPEM
DEXC vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEXC | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 1.91 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 6.31 | +1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEXC vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEXC drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEXC and SPEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEXC | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.31% | -64.41% | +46.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.31% | -11.36% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.30% | -4.14% | -10.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -14.66% | +11.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 3.43% | +1.36% |
Volatility
DEXC vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 5.72%. This indicates that DEXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEXC | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 5.72% | +4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.42% | 15.43% | +8.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.90% | 17.70% | +8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 17.36% | +5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 18.80% | +3.88% |
DEXC vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEXC has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEXC vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison
DEXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than SPEM's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF | 1.67% | 1.97% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.55% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEXC and SPEM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEXC has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to SPEM (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEXC dropped -18.31% vs SPEM's -64.41%.
On 1-year performance, DEXC leads with 39.06% vs 22.14% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DEXC has performed better with a 39.06% return vs 22.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPEM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DEXC.
SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.67% for DEXC.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DEXC and 0.07% for SPEM.
DEXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEXC and SPEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer