DEXC vs. DEM
DEXC (Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DEXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DEM is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. DEXC is actively managed, while DEM is passively managed. Over the past year, DEXC returned 39.06% vs 24.73% for DEM. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DEXC charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
DEXC vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEXC achieves a 22.11% return, which is significantly higher than DEM's 17.08% return.
DEXC
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 22.11%
- 1Y
- 39.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.12%
DEM
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 1Y
- 24.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.90M | $9.48M | $10.87M | |
| $1.25M | $1.39M | $1.60M |
DEXC vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF | 22.11% | 27.13% | -1.63% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 17.08% | 21.29% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEXC and DEM is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DEXC and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEXC vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEXC
DEM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DEXC
DEM
Financial Services
DEXC
DEM
Industrials
DEXC
DEM
Basic Materials
DEXC
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
DEXC
DEM
Communication Services
DEXC
DEM
Consumer Defensive
DEXC
DEM
Energy
DEXC
DEM
Healthcare
DEXC
DEM
Utilities
DEXC
DEM
Real Estate
DEXC
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEXC vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
DEXC
DEM
DEXC vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEXC | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.15 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 9.50 | -1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEXC vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEXC drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEXC and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEXC | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.31% | -51.85% | +33.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.31% | -7.89% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.30% | -3.57% | -10.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -12.82% | +9.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 2.61% | +2.18% |
Volatility
DEXC vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.12%. This indicates that DEXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEXC | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.08% | 5.12% | +4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.42% | 13.28% | +11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.90% | 15.02% | +10.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 15.60% | +7.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 17.85% | +4.83% |
DEXC vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEXC has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEXC vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
DEXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than DEM's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.18% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF | 1.67% | 1.97% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEXC and DEM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEXC has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to DEM (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEXC dropped -18.31% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 1-year performance, DEXC leads with 39.06% vs 24.73% for DEM. On fees, DEXC is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DEXC has performed better with a 39.06% return vs 24.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEXC is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 1.67% for DEXC.
DEXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DEM is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DEXC and 0.63% for DEM.
DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEXC and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer