DEUS vs. UPGR
DEUS (Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF) and UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEUS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index, while UPGR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DEUS returned 19.24% vs 80.78% for UPGR. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEUS charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for UPGR.
Performance
DEUS vs. UPGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEUS achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly lower than UPGR's 25.26% return.
DEUS
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 11.97%
- 1Y
- 19.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
UPGR
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 25.26%
- 6M
- 25.20%
- 1Y
- 80.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEUS vs. UPGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 10.91% | 10.41% | 14.33% | 5.07% |
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 25.26% | 35.25% | -14.72% | -15.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEUS and UPGR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between DEUS and UPGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEUS vs. UPGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEUS
UPGR
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
DEUS
UPGR
Technology
DEUS
UPGR
Financial Services
DEUS
UPGR
Healthcare
DEUS
UPGR
-
Consumer Cyclical
DEUS
UPGR
Consumer Defensive
DEUS
UPGR
Utilities
DEUS
UPGR
Energy
DEUS
UPGR
Basic Materials
DEUS
UPGR
Real Estate
DEUS
UPGR
-
Communication Services
DEUS
UPGR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEUS vs. UPGR — Risk / Return Rank
DEUS
UPGR
DEUS vs. UPGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEUS | UPGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 2.69 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 3.35 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 4.77 | -1.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.62 | 11.74 | -1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEUS | UPGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.69 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.24 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
DEUS vs. UPGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEUS drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, smaller than the maximum UPGR drawdown of -46.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEUS and UPGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEUS | UPGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -46.60% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -16.55% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -20.55% | +16.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 6.72% | -4.92% |
Volatility
DEUS vs. UPGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) is 2.97%, while Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) has a volatility of 10.55%. This indicates that DEUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEUS | UPGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 10.55% | -7.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.17% | 20.32% | -12.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 30.23% | -19.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 30.49% | -14.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 30.49% | -12.51% |
DEUS vs. UPGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEUS has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than UPGR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEUS vs. UPGR - Dividend Comparison
DEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than UPGR's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.49% | 1.74% | 1.14% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 2.75% |
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 0.26% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEUS and UPGR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPGR has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to DEUS (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEUS dropped -40.47% vs UPGR's -46.60%.
On 1-year performance, UPGR leads with 80.78% vs 19.24% for DEUS. On fees, DEUS is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UPGR has performed better with a 80.78% return vs 19.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEUS is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UPGR.
DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.26% for UPGR.
DEUS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while UPGR is Energy Equities. DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index, while UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DEUS and 0.35% for UPGR.
UPGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEUS and UPGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer