PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEUS vs. EMCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEUS vs. EMCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEUS achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly lower than EMCS's 35.45% return.


DEUS

1D
0.73%
1M
2.26%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.97%
1Y
19.24%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
11.31%

EMCS

1D
1.81%
1M
14.49%
YTD
35.45%
6M
39.15%
1Y
67.22%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEUS vs. EMCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
10.91%10.41%14.33%14.73%-11.18%26.31%8.81%28.80%-7.46%
EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
35.45%38.71%10.12%5.68%-23.58%-2.02%19.72%19.54%-0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DEUS and EMCS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018

0.58

The correlation between DEUS and EMCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEUS vs. EMCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEUS
EMCS

Industrials

17.6%
2.5%

Technology

15.5%
44.5%

Financial Services

12.1%
29.4%

Healthcare

11.4%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
0.0%

Utilities

7.3%
0.8%

Energy

5.5%
1.6%

Basic Materials

4.5%
2.6%

Real Estate

4.3%
1.0%

Communication Services

3.8%
8.4%

Industrials

DEUS
17.6%
EMCS
2.5%

Technology

DEUS
15.5%
EMCS
44.5%

Financial Services

DEUS
12.1%
EMCS
29.4%

Healthcare

DEUS
11.4%
EMCS
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DEUS
10.6%
EMCS
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

DEUS
7.5%
EMCS
0.0%

Utilities

DEUS
7.3%
EMCS
0.8%

Energy

DEUS
5.5%
EMCS
1.6%

Basic Materials

DEUS
4.5%
EMCS
2.6%

Real Estate

DEUS
4.3%
EMCS
1.0%

Communication Services

DEUS
3.8%
EMCS
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEUS vs. EMCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEUS
DEUS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

EMCS
EMCS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEUS vs. EMCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEUSEMCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

3.03

-1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

3.84

-1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.54

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

4.78

-1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.62

18.54

-7.92

DEUS vs. EMCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the EMCS Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEUS and EMCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEUSEMCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

3.03

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.41

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.55

+0.08

Drawdowns

DEUS vs. EMCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEUS drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, smaller than the maximum EMCS drawdown of -44.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEUS and EMCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEUSEMCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-44.86%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-14.32%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-16.73%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.89%

-42.06%

+21.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-16.62%

+12.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

3.69%

-1.89%

Volatility

DEUS vs. EMCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) is 2.97%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that DEUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEUSEMCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

9.71%

-6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

19.36%

-11.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

22.33%

-11.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

20.63%

-5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

21.65%

-3.67%

DEUS vs. EMCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEUS has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DEUS vs. EMCS - Dividend Comparison

DEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than EMCS's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
1.45%1.59%1.36%1.49%1.74%1.14%1.61%1.65%1.77%1.31%2.75%
EMCS
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF
1.23%1.66%0.67%3.07%2.26%1.46%1.40%3.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEUS and EMCS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMCS has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to DEUS (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEUS dropped -40.47% vs EMCS's -44.86%.

On 5-year performance, DEUS leads with 9.49% vs 8.46% for EMCS. On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DEUS has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DEUS.

DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.23% for EMCS.

DEUS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while EMCS is Emerging Markets Equities. DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index, while EMCS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DEUS and 0.15% for EMCS.

EMCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEUS and EMCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer