DEUS vs. EMCS
DEUS (Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF) and EMCS (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEUS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index, while EMCS is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEUS returned 9.49%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for EMCS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEUS charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCS.
Performance
DEUS vs. EMCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEUS achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly lower than EMCS's 35.45% return.
DEUS
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 11.97%
- 1Y
- 19.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
EMCS
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 14.49%
- YTD
- 35.45%
- 6M
- 39.15%
- 1Y
- 67.22%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
DEUS vs. EMCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 10.91% | 10.41% | 14.33% | 14.73% | -11.18% | 26.31% | 8.81% | 28.80% | -7.46% |
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 35.45% | 38.71% | 10.12% | 5.68% | -23.58% | -2.02% | 19.72% | 19.54% | -0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEUS and EMCS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between DEUS and EMCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEUS vs. EMCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEUS
EMCS
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
DEUS
EMCS
Technology
DEUS
EMCS
Financial Services
DEUS
EMCS
Healthcare
DEUS
EMCS
Consumer Cyclical
DEUS
EMCS
Consumer Defensive
DEUS
EMCS
Utilities
DEUS
EMCS
Energy
DEUS
EMCS
Basic Materials
DEUS
EMCS
Real Estate
DEUS
EMCS
Communication Services
DEUS
EMCS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEUS vs. EMCS — Risk / Return Rank
DEUS
EMCS
DEUS vs. EMCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEUS | EMCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 3.03 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 3.84 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.54 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 4.78 | -1.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.62 | 18.54 | -7.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEUS | EMCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 3.03 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.41 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.55 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
DEUS vs. EMCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEUS drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, smaller than the maximum EMCS drawdown of -44.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEUS and EMCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEUS | EMCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -44.86% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -14.32% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.69% | -16.73% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -42.06% | +21.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -16.62% | +12.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 3.69% | -1.89% |
Volatility
DEUS vs. EMCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) is 2.97%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that DEUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEUS | EMCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 9.71% | -6.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.17% | 19.36% | -11.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 22.33% | -11.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 20.63% | -5.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 21.65% | -3.67% |
DEUS vs. EMCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEUS has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DEUS vs. EMCS - Dividend Comparison
DEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than EMCS's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.49% | 1.74% | 1.14% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 2.75% |
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 1.23% | 1.66% | 0.67% | 3.07% | 2.26% | 1.46% | 1.40% | 3.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEUS and EMCS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMCS has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to DEUS (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEUS dropped -40.47% vs EMCS's -44.86%.
On 5-year performance, DEUS leads with 9.49% vs 8.46% for EMCS. On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DEUS has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DEUS.
DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.23% for EMCS.
DEUS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while EMCS is Emerging Markets Equities. DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index, while EMCS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DEUS and 0.15% for EMCS.
EMCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEUS and EMCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer